Strange theme, I know. But He is using the concept of kings to teach lessons of submission and acceptance to me.
The cultivation of a more submissive heart - toward Him and toward other authorities has been a life-long struggle for me. Forthose who know me well, it comes as no surprise that I can be a bit opinionated. . . even arrogant. My natural tendency is to believe I know what is best in pretty much every situation. However, over the years God has allowed me to be in enough situations where I definitely do NOT know what is best to teach me a bit of humility.
But I think there is a difference between humility and a submissive heart. Humility is an acknowledgement of a lack of knowledge, the admission that I do not know everything about everything. Submission, on the other hand, is the willingness to follow another's lead. The operative word here is "willingness."
Now don't get me wrong, I am perfectly willing to follow when someone is leading in a manner that is attractive to me. That is, if the person is kind, caring, has the best interests of his or her followers at heart. Following someone like that is, generally speaking, not a problem. But I tend to balk and begin to take issue when the person leading has an obvious lack of concern for the well-being of those following, or a greater concern for their agenda than for their people.
I recently read the book A Tale of Three Kings, in which the author, Gene Edwards, takes a look at Saul, David & Absalom. More to the point, he takes a look at David's heart in his dealings with Saul and Absalom. There are a couple things in the book that really hit home with me.
The first is David's refusal to grasp the kingdom. Although he had been anointed as king, he would not make a move against Saul. I have wondered several times if David's logic went something like, Saul was anointed king, then I was anointed king. If I choose to take the kingdom from Saul by force, then what can I expect to happend to me later on? Will someone choose to take the kingdom from me by force? Scripture does not tell us David's thoughts on the issue, it simply tells us that he refused to raise a hand against Saul because he, Saul, was God's anointed king. David lived his life as best he could while awaiting the fulfillment of God's promise that he would be king, but did nothing to hasten that day.
Later, when Absalom wrested the throne from him, David did not fight to remain king. Edward's take was that David figured that the kingdom belonged to God, and it was His to lead through whomever He saw fit. If God was finished with David, then David was okay with that. If not, he trusted God to return him to the throne. It's a view that I've never heard before, and I think it has merit.
This idea has started me wondering, what are the things in my life, the kingdoms if you will, to which I cling? Do I view all things as belonging to God, or do I grasp at certain things, claiming them as mine? What about my ideas, my ways of doing things, my habits and the generalities of the life I live? Do I have a firm grasp on these things, making sure that they do not slip from my hands? If God chose to make drastic changes or even remove some or all of these things from my life, how would I react? Would I plead my case before Him, demanding, appealing, pleading, begging, to have things back? Or would I accept His decision as best for not only me, but for everyone involved?
I'm afraid that there are some things about which I would rail against the perceived injustice of the change or removal. So now I get to pray for a heart that receives all things as from the hand of my loving Heavenly Father, a heart that acknowledges and willingly accepts His sovereignty in every situation.
I wrote the last three paragraphs earlier this afternoon. I couldn't finish writing this piece at the time because I needed to do some homework reading, then leave to go to our weekly Bible study. On my way to Bible study, however, I almost rear-ended a minivan. Instead I ended up crashing the side of my husband's truck into the right rear corner panel of said minivan. I tried to go around but had to slow down to keep from going into the ditch. When I hit the brakes the tail of the truck whipped to the left and WHAM!
My very first thought after pulling the truck to a safe stop was, "Okay, Lord, You didn't have to be so pointed with this lesson!" Then my mind started running through all those involved - the family in the minivan, my husband & myself - and the fact that I now get to choose to trust God that this is somehow going to work out for the good in all our lives.
To be honest, I don't see anything good in this.
No, that is not true. There are some good things.- There were no injuries
- Both vehicles were able to be driven away from the scene.
- My husband, who had been at a men's retreat since Thursday evening, called within 5 minutes of the accident to say that he was on his way home, and was able to meet me at a safe place a block or so from the accident site.
So there are good things to see in this circumstance. And I am deeply grateful for those things. I am so glad that no one was hurt! When I saw those little ones in the back seat with their mama, I was just horrified to think what could have happened if I had hit them straight on, or if I had been a few feet further when I hit the brakes and the tail end of my truck had hit the side of their car...
God truly is good ALL the time.
I do not know why this happened. I wish that it had not. However, I choose to see the good in the situation, and to be thankful for that good. As time passes and I see the story unfold, perhaps there will be even more for which I will find myself grateful.
In the meantime, I really hope that God does not choose such drastic means to bring home the other lessons He is teaching me with this theme of kings!